Back to Blog
Lumo lift review 20166/12/2023 This paper presents the underlying biomechanical elements necessary to understand and study human movement. The qualitative and quantitative data provided by these sensors make it possible for engineers, clinicians and physicians to work together to be able to help their patients in overcoming their physical disability. Direct measurement by accelerometry has seen the introduction of the successful implementation of low power, low cost electronic sensors that have been employed in clinical and home environments for the constant monitoring of patients (and their controls). One such modern technique has been direct measurement by accelerometry, which was first suggested in the 1970s but has only been refined and perfected during the last 10–15 years. These studies have utilised modern day techniques to assess human movement in many illnesses. The anatomical complexities of the human body have made it a constant source of research to this day with many anatomical, physiological, mechanical, environmental, sociological and psychological studies undertaken to define its key elements. Human movement has been the subject of investigation since the fifth century when early scientists and researchers attempted to model the human musculoskeletal system. Low cost and ease of use allow routine clinical application but with many options for sensors, algorithms, test and parameter definitions, choice and comparability remain difficult, calling for consensus or standardisation. In orthopaedics and the elderly, counting specific events such as stairs or high intensity activities were clinimetrically most powerful as were qualitative parameters at the ‘micro-level’ of activity such as step frequency or sit-stand duration. In activity monitoring (AM), accelerometry has mainly been used to derive energy expenditure or general health related parameters such as total step counts. Applied to various body segments, precise capture of time-to-task achievement, spatiotemporal gait and kinematic parameters of demanding tests or specific to an affected limb are the most used measures. Participants rated the usability of the device, in addition to their overall user experience, highly.Ībstract Wearable sensors, in particular inertial measurement units (IMUs) allow the objective, valid, discriminative and responsive assessment of physical function during functional tests such as gait, stair climbing or sit-to-stand. The data was classified offline, achieving an accuracy of 93.5%, while overall device user perception was positive. For the purposes of this study, thirty independent and semi-independent older persons undertook eight different types of physical activity, including: walking, raising arms, lowering arms, leaning forward, sitting, sitting upright, transitioning from standing to sitting, and transitioning from sitting to standing. This study proposes a wearable device to identify the bodily postures of older persons, while also looking into the perceptions of the users. The majority of current research into such sensors focuses primarily on their functionality and accuracy, and minimal effort is dedicated to understanding the experience of older persons who interact with the devices. Monitoring the posture of older persons using portable sensors while they carry out daily activities can facilitate the process of generating indicators with which to evaluate their health and quality of life.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |